Empowering
rather than serving
The older I got, the more
convinced I am to really work, programs have to be owned by the people they‘re serving.
That isn’t just rhetoric, it’s real. There’s got to be ownership.
-
George
Latimer, Former mayor of St. Paul
The real key, says Hubert
Williams, president of a research institute called the Police Foundation, ‘’is
the ability of the police to act as a catalyst to draw together community
resources, to provide resources, backup and training.’’
In short, the police can be
most effective if they help communities help themselves. This is really just common sense. We all know
that people act more responsibly when they control their own environments than
when they are under the control of others. We know that owners take better care
of homes than renters. We know that
workers who own a piece of the company are more committed than those who simply
collect a pay check. It stands to reason that when communities are empowered to
solve their own problems, they function better than communities that depend on
services provided by outsiders.
Empowerment is an American
tradition as an old as frontier. We are the nation of self- help organizations. We create our own day- care centres, our own
babysitting cooperatives, our own little leagues, our own Girls Scout and Boy Scout troops, our
own recycling programs, our own
volunteer organisation of all kinds.
And yet when we organise our
public business, we forget these lessons. We let
bureaucrats control our public services,
not those they intend to help. We rely on professionals to solve problems not families and communities. We let the police, the doctors, the teacher
and the social workers have all the control,
while the people they serving have none. ‘’Too often,’’ says George Latimer,’’
we create programs designed to collect clients rather than to empower communities
of citizens.’’
When we do this, we
undermine the confidence and competence of our citizens and communities. We create dependency. It should come as no
surprise that welfare dependency, alcohol dependency and drug dependency are
among our most severe problems.
Latimer likes to quote Tom
Dewar of the University of Minnesota’s Humphrey Institution about the dangers
of ‘’ client hood ‘’:
Clients are people who are
depended upon and controlled by their helpers and leaders. Clients are people
who understand themselves in term of their deficiencies and people who wait for
others to act on their behalf
Citizens, on the other hand are
people who understand their own problems in their own terms. Citizens perceive
their relationship to one another and they believe in their capacity to act.
Good clients make bad citizens. Good citizens
make strong communities (Reinventing
Government by David Osborne & Ted Gaebler)
The above citation is an
example of an issue that could be
compared to the goals and objectives of the interactive web’s mission, which is
geared towards the acquisition of knowledge,
skill and attitude in a holistic manner.
The interactive web is
empowering members( participants) of a great family (nations) with knowledge.
Skills and attitude gained daily to solve problems and control their own
environment in the class, at school or in terms of information and
communication technology.
The interactive web
activities will sure facilitate members to act as catalysts to draw together community
resources, to provide resources, backup and training at the end program.
No comments:
Post a Comment